position
position

High Carbon Steel vs High Speed Steel

Time:2025-09-10

If you need a low-cost, easy-to-heat-treat alloy for simple blades, springs, or structural parts where very-high-temperature performance is not required, high-carbon steels (C ≈ 0.60–1.0% and up) are often the best choice; however, when cutting speed, hot-hardness, and long edge life under high frictional heat are the priority (drills, taps, milling cutters, high-speed saw teeth), high-speed steels (HSS — alloy tool steels such as M2, M42 and tungsten/molybdenum types) outperform high-carbon steels despite higher cost and more complex heat treatment.

What “high carbon steel” means

“High carbon steel” is a plain (or low-alloy) carbon steel whose carbon content typically ranges from about 0.60% up to ~1.0–1.5% depending on classification (industry groups usually treat 0.60–1.0% as typical high carbon, >1.0% often called ultra-high carbon). These steels contain very little deliberate alloying beyond manganese and residual silicon; their properties derive mainly from the carbon content and resulting pearlitic/pearlite+cementite microstructure after cooling or heat treatment. Common commercial labels include 1045 (borderline), 1050–1095 (true high carbon). High carbon steels are widely used in springs, cutting edges (traditional knives), hand tools, and components where simple heat treatment is sufficient.

What “high speed steel (HSS)” means

High speed steels are a subset of tool steels specifically designed to retain hardness at elevated temperatures produced during metal cutting (the property engineers call “red hardness” or hot hardness). HSS grades include molybdenum types (M-series, e.g., M2), cobalt-enriched varieties (e.g., M42) and tungsten types (T-series). HSS typically contains a combination of alloying elements—tungsten (W), molybdenum (Mo), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), sometimes cobalt (Co)—together with carbon (commonly ~0.7–1.3%). The carbides formed by these elements give HSS superior abrasion resistance and hot-hardness compared with plain high carbon steels. Industry standards and specifications (ASTM A600, UNS designations) formalize the common grades and product forms.

Key Differences at a Glance

Feature
High-Carbon Steel
High-Speed Steel (HSS)
Composition
Primarily iron and carbon
Alloy steel with tungsten, molybdenum, and other elements
Heat Resistance
Poor; loses hardness when heated
Excellent; retains hardness at high temperatures (red hardness)
Hardness
60-65 HRC
65-70+ HRC
Cost
Cheaper
More expensive
Cutting Speed
Lower
Much higher (up to 3-4 times faster)
Durability
Good, but dulls faster
Superior; longer-lasting sharpness

Chemistry and microstructure: why they behave differently

  • High carbon steels: mainly Fe + C (0.60–1.0%). Microstructure after quench/temper often includes martensite (if hardened), tempered martensite plus retained carbides, or pearlite/cementite (if slowly cooled). Strength and edge hardness increase with carbon, but toughness and red-hardness are limited because there are few high-temperature alloying elements.

  • HSS: Fe + C (~0.7–1.3%) plus W, Mo, Cr, V, Co in varying amounts. These elements form complex, hard carbides (MC, M6C, M2C types), which remain stable at higher temperatures and resist softening during cutting. Carbide distribution (size, morphology) is critical: fine, uniformly distributed carbides boost edge retention and toughness.

ASTM A36 Carbon Steel Plate
ASTM A36 Carbon Steel Plate

Mechanical properties and performance

Below are the typical ranges you will see in industrial practice (actual values depend on grade, heat treat, and vendor):

  • Hardness (after appropriate heat treatment):

    • High carbon steel (hardened): typically 55–62 HRC (depending on carbon content and treatment).

    • HSS (properly quenched/tempered): typically 62–70 HRC for modern grades; cobalt HSS like M42 reach the higher end for hot hardness and wear resistance.

  • Red-hardness / hot hardness:

    • High carbon steel: loses hardness rapidly above ~200–300 °C.

    • HSS: retains hardness and cutting ability at much higher temps (often 500–650 °C in service), enabling higher cutting speeds.

  • Toughness (impact resistance):

    • Higher carbon steels with correct tempering can be tougher than some HSS grades at the same hardness; however, modern HSS grades balance wear resistance and toughness for cutting tools.

  • Wear resistance: HSS > high carbon steel for sliding/abrasion contact under heat.

Heat treatment: practical differences

  • High carbon steel: relatively straightforward — austenitize at lower temperatures (compared with HSS), quench (oil or water depending on grade), temper to required hardness/toughness trade-off. Simpler equipment suffices for best results; atmosphere control less critical.

  • HSS: needs higher austenitizing temperatures, multi-stage tempering (often three tempers), sometimes subcritical anneals, and strict cooling/atmosphere control to avoid carbide dissolution/mesh issues. Powder-metallurgy (PM) HSS variants require special handling to preserve fine carbide distribution. Carbide stability control determines final red-hardness and wear performance. Consult vendor heat-treatment charts (e.g., Carpenter, Boehler) for precise cycles.

Typical applications and selection guidance

When choosing between the two, ask these practical questions:

  • Will the part be used for high-speed cutting or continuous heavy machining? → HSS.

  • Is cost and simplicity more important than ultimate hot hardness? → High carbon steel.

  • Is the tool going to be re-sharpened many times and must maintain geometry at elevated temps? → HSS (M2/M42, or PM HSS).

  • Is the part a spring, large structural component, or a low-speed knife/saw where toughness and affordability matter? → High carbon steel.

Examples: drills, taps, and milling cutters → HSS; cheap pocket knives, machetes, simple shear blades, springs, or rebar cutters → high carbon steels.

Manufacturing and repair implications

  • Welding: high carbon steels are more weldable (with preheat/postheat when carbon is high); HSS is typically difficult to weld (carbide precipitation, cracking risk). Repairs of HSS tools are often done by brazing, specialized welding (laser/precision), or tool regrinding rather than conventional stick/MIG welds.

  • Grinding and finishing: HSS needs abrasives compatible with hard carbides (diamond or CBN grinding wheels for many PM-HSS tasks); high carbon steel is easier to grind with conventional wheels.

  • Surface treatments: PVD coatings (TiN, TiAlN) can enhance HSS performance further; coatings on high carbon steels help but are limited by substrate hot-hardness.

Cost and supply chain notes

  • Raw-material cost: HSS is more expensive per kg because of alloying elements (Mo, W, Co) and more complex processing; PM-HSS (powder metallurgy) is more costly still.

  • Lead times and stock: standard HSS grades (M2, M35, M42) are commonly stocked by tool steel suppliers; specialty HSS or PM grades may have longer lead times. High carbon steels are ubiquitous and inexpensive.

  • Buying tips: specify grade (e.g., M2 HSS, annealed bar, 1.5" diameter, ASTM A600), surface condition (annealed, hardened/tempered), and heat-treatment tolerance. For high carbon steels, specify carbon grade (e.g., 1095), desired hardness range, and whether you expect to perform in-house heat treatment.

Case A: Buyer choosing drill-rod material

Buyer: “We need 8 mm drill rod for prototype runs in 4140 and stainless. Which material for the drill bits do you recommend?”
Sales/Engineer (MWAlloys): “For high-speed machining of hardened 4140 and stainless, M2 HSS is a standard economical choice. If you expect continuous heavy production or need longer tool life on stainless, consider M42 (cobalt HSS) or a carbide option. I’ll quote M2 and M42 both in annealed bar form — which shank length do you need?”

Case B: Buyer choosing blade material for a low-cost hand tool

Buyer: “We want a low-cost machete with reasonable edge retention and easy resharpening.”
Sales/Engineer: “1095 high-carbon steel is commonly used for machete blades; it’s economical, takes a hard edge, and is simple to harden in shop. If corrosion resistance is needed, we should consider adding a coating or moving to a stainless HSS variant — but that raises costs.”

Comparison tables

Table 1 — Quick side-by-side comparison

Feature High Carbon Steel (e.g., 1095) High Speed Steel (e.g., M2, M42)
Typical carbon 0.60–1.0% 0.7–1.3%
Major additional alloying Mn (small), Si (trace) W, Mo, V, Cr, sometimes Co
Typical hardness (HTed) 55–62 HRC 62–70 HRC (varies by grade)
Hot hardness Poor above 200–300 °C Excellent; retains hardness at 500–650 °C
Wear resistance Moderate High (carbide wear resistance)
Toughness Moderate to good (if tempered) Engineered balance; PM grades improve toughness
Weldability Better (with preheat) Difficult; specialized methods
Typical applications Simple knives, springs, shear blades Cutting tools: drills, taps, endmills, saws
Cost Low Moderate–High

(Numbers are typical industrial ranges—see vendor datasheets for exact values.)

Table 2 — Representative chemical composition

Element 1095 (high carbon) typical M2 (HSS, typical)
C 0.90–1.05% 0.80–0.95%
Cr 0.20–0.40% 3.75–4.50%
Mo 4.50–5.50%
W 5.00–6.75%
V 0.00–0.20% 1.75–2.20%
Co 0.00% (M2) / ~8% (M42)

(Values shown are indicative. Consult specific grade datasheets for vendor tolerances.)

Table 3 — Use-case mapping

Requirement Prefer Why
High cutting speed / production tool HSS (M2, M42) Retains hardness at cutting temperatures
Low cost / simple heat treat High carbon Cheaper alloying and easier processing
Repeated regrinding and reconditioning HSS Carbides preserve edge geometry longer
Large spring components High carbon (spring steel) Ductility and fatigue life after tempering
Extreme abrasion + heat PM-HSS or carbide Best wear resistance under heat

Standards and technical references

Key standards and vendor resources that engineers typically cite when specifying HSS or carbon steels include:

  • ASTM A600: specification covering HSS bars/forgings.

  • Material data sheets (Carpenter, Latrobe, and other tool steel makers) documenting M2/M42 heat treatment and properties.

  • ASM/Elsevier technical chapters on tool steels and HSS performance.

  • NIST standard reference materials (SRMs) for carbon steels used in analysis and calibration.

Practical shop notes and processing warnings

  • Avoid overheating high carbon steel during grinding: tempering can occur from friction and reduce edge life. Use coolant and appropriate wheel choice.

  • HSS regrinding needs abrasive compatible with hard carbides (CBN/diamond are commonly used for some PM HSS).

  • Welding high carbon steels: preheat and post-weld tempering can reduce cracking risk. HSS welding is specialized; often brazing or mechanical repair is preferred.

  • Coatings: PVD/CVD coatings increase HSS tool life in many machining operations; they work best when substrate (HSS) already has sufficient red-hardness.

FAQs

  1. Can I substitute high carbon steel for HSS in a drill bit?
    Not if you need high cutting speeds or to machine hardened steels, the high carbon bit will lose hardness rapidly and dull. For occasional low-speed drilling, a high-carbon bit can work but expect short life.

  2. What HSS grade should I specify for stainless-steel machining?
    M2 is a common economical choice; for longer tool life on stainless (galling/welding issues), consider M42 (cobalt-enriched) or PM-HSS.

  3. Is 1095 steel the same as HSS?
    No. 1095 is a simple high carbon steel (≈0.95% C). It lacks the alloying elements that give HSS its hot-hardness and wear resistance.

  4. Are HSS tools repairable?
    Yes, usually by regrinding or brazing. Welding is rarely used; specialized precision welding or laser repairs may be an option for expensive tools.

  5. Which is cheaper per kg?
    High carbon steels are significantly cheaper per kilogram than HSS; expect HSS pricing premium due to alloy metals and processing.

  6. Can I apply coatings to high carbon steels?
    You can, but coating benefits are limited if the substrate softens under heat. Coatings work best on substrates that keep their hardness (HSS or coated carbide).

  7. How do I specify HSS in an RFQ?
    Give grade (M2/M42), product form (annealed bar, blank, ground), dimensions, and whether you require a heat-treatment certificate (HT), hardness spec, or PM grade.

  8. Does HSS outperform carbide?
    Not always, carbide has higher hot hardness and wear resistance at very high speeds, but HSS is tougher (less brittle) and easier to machine/repair for certain applications. Choice depends on material, speed, and cycle economics.

  9. Are there “stainless” HSS grades?
    HSS by definition usually contains chromium, but fully stainless HSS with high corrosion resistance is rare; most HSS are not corrosion-resistant and require coating or passivation.

  10. What tests should I require on delivery?
    Request chemical analysis (spectro), hardness (Rockwell), and heat-treatment certificates; for critical tools ask for microstructure/carbide distribution data or PM process certification. NIST SRMs are used in labs to validate spectro methods.

Closing practical checklist for buyers (copy-paste into RFQ)

  1. Grade (e.g., M2 HSS / 1095 high carbon).

  2. Product form & dimensions (bar/rod/blank/ground).

  3. Heat-treatment state required (annealed/hardened + hardness range).

  4. Certificate requirements (material cert, hardness, spectro).

  5. Surface finish & coating (if any).

  6. Quantity, delivery date, and packaging needs.
    Using this checklist reduces back-and-forth and speeds quotes.

Authoritative references

Statement: This article was published after being reviewed by MWalloys technical expert Ethan Li.

MWalloys Engineer ETHAN LI

ETHAN LI

Global Solutions Director | MWalloys

Ethan Li is the Chief Engineer at MWalloys, a position he has held since 2009. Born in 1984, he graduated with a Bachelor of Engineering in Materials Science from Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 2006, then earned his Master of Engineering in Materials Engineering from Purdue University, West Lafayette, in 2008. Over the past fifteen years at MWalloys, Ethan has led the development of advanced alloy formulations, managed cross‑disciplinary R&D teams, and implemented rigorous quality and process improvements that support the company’s global growth. Outside the lab, he maintains an active lifestyle as an avid runner and cyclist and enjoys exploring new destinations with his family.

Get Expert Technical Advice | Free Product Quote

en_USEN